A LOOK AT
IRRATIONAL DECISION MAKING IN MEDICINE
How often have you seen seemingly rational and experienced
clinicians do something completely irrational and out of character like
overlook an obvious diagnosis.
Our guests today say there is an irresistible pull of
irrational behavior driving their behaviors.
Welcome to the Clinician's Roundtable. I am Dr. Leslie
Lundt, your host, and with me today are Ori and Rom Brafman. Ori is coauthor
with his brother Rom Brafman of Sway. His previous book The Starfish and the
Spider won glowing praise from business and general publications alike. He is
an MBA. He is a life-long entrepreneur who launched a network of more than a
1000 CEOs. Rom Brafman holds a doctorate in psychology and has taught
university courses in personality and personal growth. He won the University
of Florida Social Sciences graduate teaching award and the <_____> Human
Growth and Development award. He practices in Palo Alto, California.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Welcome to ReachMD, Ori we'll start with you.
ORI BRAFMAN:
Thanks for having me.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
In your book "Sway" you give an example of an ER
case, let's go over that today.
ORI BRAFMAN:
Sure, this is one of the stories that actually led us to
write the book. A woman and her child came into the emergency room and the
child was complaining of severe stomach pain and the doctor started taking a
look and they looked up the kid and the mother and what they noticed is that
the mother in the file was flagged as a frequent flier, that is a woman who
made many emergency room visits and often times was complaining about stuff
that wasn't really an emergency, and instead of diagnosing the kid, they ended
up diagnosing the mother, and they figured, you know what this mother is just
overreacting, they sent the kid home. The next day the kid and the mother show
up again and the kid is still complaining of severe stomach pain and again they
look up the mother’s record and see that she is a frequent flier, tell them
that it's not a huge deal, go home. The third day, the daughter shows up with
the mother again and this time her condition becomes very, very serious and
ultimately it turns out that the child actually died in the emergency room and
you wonder how could the doctors miss a diagnosis, how could they not run the
appropriate tests and what happened was that instead of diagnosing the child,
the doctors ended up diagnosing the parents.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Rom, why would an experienced team of doctors make a
decision that contradicts all of their training and experience?
DR. ROM BRAFMAN:
Well, I think that's the difficulty of being a physician or
being a psychologist, especially when you are handling crises is that you have
a lot of guess going on, you've got a lot of new information that have to sift
through and you have to make decisions really fast and as human beings, our
brains are programed to want to know what's going on. We don't like chaos, we
don't like ambivalence, we don't like questionable situations, we want to know
is this person an emergency or not an emergency. Is this person for real or
not for real? If it is an emergency, what sort of an emergency it is? And our
brains work overtime to try to arrive at a conclusion ASAP. Now, ideally of
course, you know we can be more may be like a computer program and say you know
what may be there is a 60% chance that condition A is going on and may be there
is like 25% chance that condition B is going on and may be there is condition C
and condition D and let's keep all of these possibilities open and shift the
percentages as we learn more about the case, but we don't work that way. Once
we come up with a decision, like in this case, that the mother is a frequent
flier, it starts to cloud everything else. It starts to dominate and it's very
difficult to look at the data that's coming in and information that's coming as
new and as something that can direct us. We hold on to that, and that first
impression, that initial diagnosis, takes over.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
So we kind of get stuck on one track and we have a hard time
seeing any evidence that doesn't meet that track.
DR. ROM BRAFMAN:
Exactly and you know as a psychologist I try to remind myself
of that every time I see a client that immediately my brain says, you know, may
be this is going on, may be that's going on and sometimes it's because of even
little things, you know, may be the way the person is dressed or may be you
know they didn’t comb their hair or may be they're not really talkative or may
be the information that they give me, and I have stop myself and say am I
really looking at all the different options or I am being stuck on one specific
thing that's letting me astray and a lot of times, it's almost like an ego
thing, like I don't want to think well I might be wrong and I can't afford to
think I might be wrong all the time, but it's creating this perfect balance
between being confident in where I want to go, but the same time being open to
the possibility that I might be making a mistake and that's a really difficult
balance to create.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Now, Rom in the book you also bring up an issue that's near
and dear, at least to me as a psychiatrist, and that's the so-called bipolar
epidemic, tell us about that one.
DR. ROM BRAFMAN:
Oh, that's really interesting. You know, when I first went
to school and took my first psychology class, and you know, we talked about all
the different disorders and the professor talked about the bipolar disorder,
and basically nobody in the class including myself knew what bipolar disorder
was and the way they described it, he said, you know, it's a very rare disorder
and it's a very extreme disorder when you have a person who just goes through
these major extremes, being up like night after night after night and then on
other nights when being so depressed you can't even get out of bed and you just
oscillate back and forth and even showed us a picture of a man who was being
arrested because he was walking in the middle of the freeway and he said that's
the manic stage and it just stayed with me that bipolar is a very serious
condition and bipolar is a condition that's also very rare and then during my
graduate training I thought of hearing bipolar being used more and more often
and it first goes like well, you know, some of it didn’t make sense because I
thought bipolar was really rare and additionally bipolar started being applying
to kids, teenagers, but even younger kids, so a kid who'd come in and they
would be moody or the grades would go down or they would just come across to
others as being a loner or being strange or being weird in some way and
psychiatrists and psychologists started using the label of bipolar to describe
those kids and there is a study that was done that between the mid 90s to a
decade later, the bipolar numbers went up by a factor of 40 in the age group of
kids which means for every kid that was diagnosed bipolar, 10 years later, you
have 40 kids being diagnosed as bipolar and I talked about it with Ori and I
said something is going on because we can't think of anything that might be
going on to explain why so many kids would actually come up with the diagnosis
of bipolar unless the disorder started being a catch phrase that unknowingly
psychologists and psychiatrists started overusing the bipolar diagnosis and in
my practice I see that all of time. I see mothers and fathers of teenaged kids
come in and say I think my kid might have bipolar disorder and to me my first
reaction is well if that's the case, then I want to take it very, very
seriously because, you know, one of the things about bipolar disorder is that
the chances of suicide behavior increases dramatically. So I want to be very
sensitive to that, but if it's really a case of PTSD or if it's a case of mild
depression, I don't want to use bipolar disorder just because their mood shifts
from time to time.
If you're just joining us, you're listening to the
Clinician's Roundtable on ReachMD XM 157, The Channel for Medical
Professionals. I am Dr. Leslie Lundt, your host, and with me today we have Ori
and Rom Brafman, the authors of "Sway." We are discussing the
irresistible pull of irrational behavior.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Now Ori, are the same psychological factors that work here
with the bipolar “epidemic” as with the ER misdiagnosis.
ORI BRAFMAN:
Exactly, so what happens is that we tend to make a diagnosis
based on the very little information and once we make that diagnosis, it's very
difficult to see things in any other perspective, so after that initial
diagnosis we ignore any data, no matter how strong that contradicts our initial
diagnosis.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
That's all fine and good, but what about the hard part, how
do we as clinicians resist this pull of irrational behavior?
ORI BRAFMAN:
Well, the thing is to really focus on data and there is an
example we look at the book at job interviews and it turns out the job
interviews and bipolar and the emergency room all have something in common and
that's you have a person and situation where you need to make a diagnosis very
quickly and the impact is going to be felt long after the initial diagnosis and
it turns out that managers are actually really terrible at actually
interviewing candidate and that job interviews are very poor predictors of
actual performance on the eventual career, and the reason for that is that a
candidate comes in, may be the say all the right things, they may be have something
in common with them, we share a few jokes, say Oh, they're going to be great
for the job, but there is a very local relation between those kind of job
interviews and actual performance and the only approach of job interviews that
actually works in the long run is asking pre-scripted questions and making sure
that we focus on the relevant data, so rather asking what do you want to do in
5 years, ask questions like what specific qualifications do you have working in
this job, what experience you have working on this offer. What would you do in
this hypothetical scenario and that when we have the scripted job interview, we
force ourselves to what Rom was talking about, look at the real data and not
take the mental-psychological short-cut of arriving at a conclusion too early.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
So, I guess that clinical translation of that would be to
use, say diagnostic algorithms in the ER where you asked the same questions
every time for any particular presenting complaint, no matter what the mother's
chart says or how they are dressed or whatever.
ORI BRAFMAN:
That's exactly what doctors are working on and what was
interesting for me is in emergency rooms, I have talked to doctors where they
said that a nurse might put something on the chart, just very casually, may be
from initial interview and said oh this person might be suffering from heart
disease or might be suffering from diabetes and even that little note in the
chart, even if it's completely wrong, even if it was put there by accident,
makes the doctors ignore other symptoms and often they see someone present with
symptoms that they might not actually because they are so looking through to
situation through the lenses of, well, here is a diabetic in front of me, let
me ask them these questions or if someone who has heart disease let me ask them
these questions and ignore data that contradicts what they think they are
looking out.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Well, thank you so much for being on our show today.
ORI BRAFMAN:
Thanks for having me.
DR. ROM BRAFMAN:
Thank you.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
We've been speaking with Ori and Rom Brafman about their
book "Sway" which talks about the irresistible pull of irrational
behavior and what you can do to stop it.
I am Dr. Leslie Lundt. You've been listening to ReachMD
XM 157, The Channel for Medical Professionals.
For a complete program guide and downloadable pod casts,
visit our website at www.reachmd.com.
For comments and questions, give us a ring at 888-MD-XM157. Thank you for
listening.
Hello, this is Peter Farrell, Vice President of Abbott
Point-of-Care, division of Abbott Laboratories, and you've been listening to
ReachMD XM 157, The Channel for Medical Professionals.