1. Home
  2. Medical News
  3. Emergency Medicine
advertisement

ED Amnesia Testing After Head Injury: 8.2% Failed A-WPTAS

Simplified brain illustration highlighting memory function in post traumatic amnesia assessment after head injury
11/12/2026

Key Takeaways

  • Among adults with head injury tested at an Australian tertiary emergency department, 513 (8.2%) failed the abbreviated Westmead amnesia test.
  • Reported loss of consciousness did not significantly distinguish A-WPTAS pass rates.
  • A-WPTAS failure occurred more often with lower initial GCS scores, in male patients, after low falls, and among after-hours arrivals.
Post-traumatic amnesia can be difficult to identify when adults present after head injury with suspected concussion. Reported loss of consciousness (LOC) may be part of the initial history, but whether it coincides with amnesia detected by the Abbreviated Westmead Post-Traumatic Amnesia Scale (A-WPTAS) is uncertain. Other presentation features may also coincide with what the screen detects.

In a retrospective cohort, investigators conducted a single-center review of electronic records from The Alfred Hospital adult tertiary emergency department (ED) in Victoria, Australia, for January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2021. Eligible adults were at least 18 years old, had presented with head injury, and had a documented, sufficiently complete A-WPTAS assessment. Initial-only assessments and records missing the three-picture tasks were excluded. Hospital policy called for testing after head impact when a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13–15 accompanied confusion, disorientation, anterograde or retrograde amnesia, or brief LOC. Investigators compared passage and failure by reported LOC, initial GCS, age, and injury mechanism; they also reported sex and arrival time.

Of 6,259 analyzed adults, 5,746 passed the A-WPTAS (91.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 91.1%–92.5%). A passing result meant that the completed assessment did not detect post-traumatic amnesia.

Pass rates were 90.6% among adults with reported LOC and 92% among those without it (p=0.13), a difference that was not statistically significant. Failure occurred more often with lower initial GCS scores, in male patients, after low falls, and among after-hours arrivals. Because GCS contributes to A-WPTAS scoring, that association is not independent of the test itself. Age did not differ significantly between those who passed and failed; ED stays were longer among those who failed.

These observations come from adults with sufficiently complete testing at one Australian tertiary ED, rather than all adults presenting with head injury. LOC was self-reported and susceptible to recall bias. The inclusion of GCS in A-WPTAS scoring also limits what its association with failure can independently establish. No long-term follow-up occurred, so rates of persistent post-concussion symptoms in this cohort are unknown. A passing amnesia screen cannot establish the absence of other concussion symptoms or predict which adults will experience later symptoms.

For the investigators, amnesia detectable during an ED assessment represents one part of the clinical picture after concussion, not a measure of its full symptom burden.

Clinician Questions

How many adults who started A-WPTAS after head injury were excluded from the Australian ED analysis, and why?

At The Alfred Hospital ED in Victoria, Australia, 8,253 adults began A-WPTAS after head injury. Investigators excluded 47 whose GCS score was below 13 and 1,947 with incomplete data, including initial-only testing or incomplete assessment or documentation of the three-picture tasks.

Which concussion symptoms can A-WPTAS miss after adult head injury despite a passing amnesia screen?

After adult head injury, A-WPTAS focuses on post-traumatic amnesia and cognition. Essery and colleagues described possible concussion symptoms beyond overt amnesia, including emotional or behavioral change, cognitive fog or difficulty concentrating, headache or dizziness, sensory sensitivity, and sleep disruption.

Recommended Reading

This content is intended for healthcare professionals for educational purposes. The article and its image were developed with AI assistance and reviewed by members of the ReachMD team prior to publication. Please refer to the original source linked for the complete and most up-to-date information.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals for educational purposes. The article and its image were developed with AI assistance and reviewed by members of the ReachMD team prior to publication. Please refer to the original source linked for the complete and most up-to-date information.

Register

We’re glad to see you’re enjoying ReachMD…
but how about a more personalized experience?

Register for free