Over the past two decades, there’s been a major shift in understanding testosterone’s role in prostate cancer, with emerging evidence suggesting it may be beneficial rather than harmful. In fact, recent data suggests testosterone therapy could even be protective against biochemical recurrence. Here to discuss this paradigm shift and the role of the prostate saturation model is Dr. Mohit Khera, Professor in the Scott Department of Urology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he also holds the F. Brantley Scott Chair.
Reevaluating Testosterone: A Paradigm Shift in Prostate Cancer Treatment

Announcer:
Welcome to On the Frontlines of Prostate Cancer on ReachMD. On this episode, we’ll hear from Dr. Mohit Khera, who will be discussing the use of testosterone after the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Dr. Khera is a Professor in the Scott Department of Urology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he also holds the F. Brantley Scott Chair. Here he is now.
Dr. Khera:
Over the past two decades, there’s been a complete paradigm shift in the way we think about testosterone and prostate cancer. When I first finished my fellowship back in 2007, we were taught that testosterone was dangerous for prostate cancer. Shortly after that, we were starting to become more and more comfortable, believing that maybe testosterone could be safe in men with a history of prostate cancer. And over the past decade, we’re really entering an era where we’re finding that testosterone may not only be therapeutic, but it may be beneficial in the treatment of prostate cancer. So really, the paradigm has completely shifted. There is some data now to suggest that testosterone may be protective against biochemical recurrence.
The prostate saturation model really offers greater insight in how PSAs change with testosterone levels. We were taught that as we give more and more testosterone, the PSA continues to go up. That is a linear model, but that is not true. At some point, the PSA will plateau. So many of us believe that the saturation point is roughly around 250 ng/dL. We showed that in one of our earlier papers in 2011. Others have actually corroborated those findings as well—that roughly around 250 ng/dL, the prostate saturates—suggesting that if you take the testosterone level higher to 2,000 or 3,000 ng/dL, you should not see any significant increase in prostate PSA or prostate size. And those studies have been done. Actually, Shelly Bernstein earlier on gave men very high doses of testosterone, took their levels all the way up to 2,500, and saw no changes in PSA or prostate growth. So again, we do know that the Prostate Saturation Model is a very helpful model in understanding these PSA changes.
But conversely, we all know that if you give a man Lupron and you bring his testosterone level down, particularly below 250 ng/dL, those patients do see a significant decline in PSA. And so where this becomes really important is when you’re starting a man on testosterone whose starting testosterone level is, say, at 180 ng/dL. That man’s testosterone is below the saturation point, so when I start that man on testosterone supplementation, I expect to see a rise in the PSA. And most would say that rise is roughly about 0.3 ng/dL, but we do expect a rise. If I have a man who starts his testosterone starting at 290 ng/dL and I start him on testosterone supplementation, I don’t expect to see that much of a rise in PSA. So the saturation model really helps us understand at what levels of testosterone we should be seeing changes in PSA once we initiate therapy.
Announcer:
That was Dr. Mohit Khera sharing considerations for using testosterone after localized prostate cancer treatment. To access this and other episodes in our series, visit On the Frontlines of Prostate Cancer on ReachMD.com, where you can Be Part of the Knowledge. Thanks for listening!
Ready to Claim Your Credits?
You have attempts to pass this post-test. Take your time and review carefully before submitting.
Good luck!
Overview
Over the past two decades, there’s been a major shift in understanding testosterone’s role in prostate cancer, with emerging evidence suggesting it may be beneficial rather than harmful. In fact, recent data suggests testosterone therapy could even be protective against biochemical recurrence. Here to discuss this paradigm shift and the role of the prostate saturation model is Dr. Mohit Khera, Professor in the Scott Department of Urology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he also holds the F. Brantley Scott Chair.
Title
Share on ReachMD
CloseProgram Chapters
Segment Chapters
Playlist:
Recommended
Implementing a Multidisciplinary Approach to Heart Failure: Patient Identification and Treatment Using Novel Device Therapy
IgG4-RD Case Conversations: Using Thoracic CT as a Diagnostic Clue
IgG4-RD Case Conversations: IgG4-related Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Cholangitis
Digesting IgG4-RD: An Interactive, Multidisciplinary Case Conference
Diagnosis and Management of Metastatic PDAC
HF Management for Patients with Comorbid Conditions
Level Up Your Skills: Tailoring Management of HF
FAIR-HF2 Trial: Ferric Carboxymaltose Assessment of Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Iron Deficiency and Chronic Heart Failure
We’re glad to see you’re enjoying ReachMD…
but how about a more personalized experience?