Clinical guidelines are available in abundance, through peer-reviewed medical journals, library-based databases and evidence-based reports. But these guidelines may not provide recommendations that are ideal for our patients’ individual needs. What if we could merge relevant data from a range of studies, creating instant meta-analyses tailored to our patients? Host Dr. Jennifer Shu explores this concept with Dr. Todd Feinman, practicing hospitalist at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center in Torrance, Calif., and founder of Doctor Evidence, a Web-based customizable digital database of disease treatment and drug efficacy information. Could medical organizations use similar mechanisms to develop policy statements or clinical recommendations?
Register
We’re glad to see you’re enjoying ReachMD…
but how about a more personalized experience?
Innovative Approaches to Analyzing Clinical Evidence
Restart
Resume
Share this program on:
Choose a format
Media formats available:
Completing the pre-test is required to access this content.
Completing the pre-survey is required to view this content.
Ready to Claim Your Credits?
You have attempts to pass this post-test. Take your time and review carefully before submitting.
Good luck!
Details
Presenters
Comments
Recommended
Details
Presenters
Comments
Overview
Clinical guidelines are available in abundance, through peer-reviewed medical journals, library-based databases and evidence-based reports. But these guidelines may not provide recommendations that are ideal for our patients’ individual needs. What if we could merge relevant data from a range of studies, creating instant meta-analyses tailored to our patients? Host Dr. Jennifer Shu explores this concept with Dr. Todd Feinman, practicing hospitalist at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center in Torrance, Calif., and founder of Doctor Evidence, a Web-based customizable digital database of disease treatment and drug efficacy information. Could medical organizations use similar mechanisms to develop policy statements or clinical recommendations?