THE PSYCHOLOGY OF
RELIGIOUS VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM
Welcome to ReachMD’s medical focus series. This month,
ReachMD explores our nation’s progress in disaster medicine and public health
preparedness. Religious terrorism has become commonplace in out lifetime.
What causes the person to kill innocent strangers in the name of religion? Our
guest today is uniquely qualified to address this question. He is an authority
on comparative religion and a clinical psychologist. Welcome to our special
segment on disaster medicine. I am Dr. Leslie Lundt, your host and with me
today is Dr. James Jones. Dr. James Jones. Dr. Jones is a distinguished
Professor of Religion and an Adjunct Professor of Clinical Psychology at
Rutgers University, New Jersey. He is also a Senior Research Fellow at the
Center on Terrorism of John Jay College in New York City. In addition to
practicing as a clinical psychologist, Dr. Jones is widely published. His
latest book is “Blood That Cries Out From The Earth.”
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Welcome to ReachMD, Dr. Jones.
DR. JAMES JONES:
Thank you very much. It is great to be here. I am looking
forward to the discussion.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Now what factors work to make ordinary people become so
dangerous?
DR. JAMES JONES:
Well, I think particularly in terms of people with a sort of
religious orientation, I think what is going on there is that religious and
spiritual longings can be very powerful for people in need for a meaningful
life, a sense of meeting and purpose, sense of being connected to something
greater, a sense of belonging to community, and when these very powerful
religious and spiritual desires get hooked up with certain psychological
longings, experiences of shame and humiliations, and the need to see the world
in black and white categories and split the world into opposing camps of pure
and impure, <_____> punitive vengeful deity or teacher, connection of
purification and bloodshed, fascination with violence, and over idealization of
one’s own tribe or nation. It is the combination of those powerful religious
and spiritual strivings with these psychological factors that make up the
psychological precondition to turn towards religious violence and religious
terrorism.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
And how does religion play into these things?
DR. JAMES JONES:
Well, I think religion often play upon and reinforce
feelings of shame and humiliation. They often pass beyond humility, which is a
virtue into making people feel humiliated, which is a psychological problem.
Religion has often split the world into an apocalyptic cosmic battle of good
against evil. They demonize the other, they make the other satanic, you know,
and a demonic enemy cannot be reasoned with. A demonic enemy can only be
destroyed. Often times religions teach a theology of laugh and vengeance,
while that is not traditional in any major world religion; it certainly becomes
predominant in religious groups that turn towards terrorism. Sometimes they
teach a connection between purification and bloody sacrifice and sometimes they
promote an uncriticial over idealization of their own teachings or their own
tradition and I think those are some of the ways that religion contribute
uniquely to moving people on the direction of terrorism.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Are certain religions more likely to produce violent
extremist?
DR. JAMES JONES:
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Now, in your book, “Blood that cries out from the earth” you
draw parallels between seemingly very different groups such as the Buddhist
splinter group responsible for the Tokyo subway gas attacks, all the way to the
antiabortion crusade of the religious right here in this country. How do you
connect those two?
DR. JAMES JONES:
I think that is basically the point in the book that there
are certain themes which I have already mentioned. There are certain themes
that cut across all these different traditions. There are certain themes that
are sort of on the boundary of spirituality and psychology that virtually all
religiously motivated terrorists share and take people who are community mental
health people. This is something I often say if I speak to people in community
mental health or the police officers, you know, these things can be warning
signs that a religion has the potential. It does not mean it is going to
become, but if you have a religious group where the members really are
subjected to a profound experiences of shame and humiliation or if you have a
religious group that is split humanity into the all good against the all evil
and demonizes the other or if you have a religious group that has a very
<_____> punitive idea of God or the leader, if you have a group that has
a conviction that purification requires the shedding of blood and bloody
sacrifice, if you have a group that is fascinated with violence, and has a lot
of violence in its religious imagery, those are warning sign. It does not mean
the group is necessarily going to become terroristic, but those are warning sign
that a group has the potential to go in that direction. So if you have a
patient that belongs to such a group or if you are a community health person or
a first responder and you see groups that have those characteristics lay bare
paying to attention to, I think.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
If you are just joining us, you are listening to the
clinician’s roundtable on ReachMD XM 157, the channel for medical
professionals. I am Dr. Leslie Lundt, your host and with me today is Dr. James
Jones. We are discussing the psychology of religious terrorism.
Dr. Jones, how can we best help our patients who might be
struggling with some of these issues?
DR. JAMES JONES:
Well, that is a good question and I have been thinking about
that question and I think there are really 3 rather different groups that I can
think of, of different groups of patient. There are people who have directly
experienced a terrorist attack, people in New York or Washington on 9/11 or
people in Oklahoma city or other such groups and there it seems to me the best
thing is to think about the research on coping, the difference between positive
and negative coping, and people who use positive coping methods and encourage
people to use positive coping methods that seek social support, they become
involved in community service and help others, may be draw on their religious
or spiritual resources if they have them to become more self reflective of
their values and what is important in their life, I think, those are the things
that you see in people who have directly experienced a terrorist attack or any
disaster that seems to lead the positive outcome. If on the other hand the
patient is nursing anger and revenge or is keeping their feelings bottled up or
is withdrawing from friends or family, those are kind of warning signs, I
think. But you have one group of patients who have directly experienced them
and you have a large number of people. These are really the second group, the
people that I really wrote this book for, “Blood that cries out from the earth”
which are people who may not have directly experienced a terrorist attack, but
are trying to understand what motivates people to do this and if people are
struggling with that question then I suppose I have to recommend my book which
is I suppose a typical academic trick but still. Then it seems to be that
there is a third group that we do not take so seriously, but there is research
about this that people who have experienced what we might call vicarious
traumatization and they may not have been there on 9/11 in New York. They may
not have lost someone on 9/11 or in Oklahoma city, but they saw enough of it on
television or they read it enough about it in the newspaper, on the internet
that they were traumatized even though they did not live in an area where it
was experienced directly in the way that, lets say I did here in the New York
metropolitan area, but I think we need to take that vicarious traumatization
seriously and not to dismiss it and say, “oh well, you were not there, you were
not really traumatized by it.” No, people can be traumatized vicariously by
seeing images on the TV or the internet or the newspaper. So I think there
goes 3 groups and I think they need to be approached somewhat differently and I
think it is important to sort of differentiate those 3 groups.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
And certainly you mention of what we see on TV, just today
there was another story about some car bomb blowing up a bunch of people, I
mean, it seems almost relentless. Is there a risk at all of sort of a flip
side of this that may be patients or people are getting immune to this because
it is seemingly so common now?
DR. JAMES JONES:
Well, I do not think people in United States are immune to a
concern with terrorist attacks in the United States or in North America or may
be even in Europe if you have friends or family or business associates in
Europe, but things that happen further away in Pakistan or Afghanistan or Iraq
or Iran or some place like that if you have do not have a direct connection,
yes, I think people do become desensitized to news about the war or in
Afghanistan or Iraq or somewhere out in the Middle East then I think there is a
desensitizing that sets in, which I think you are absolutely right. I think
that is a problem, not so much I think of medical or psychological problem, but
it is a political problem because then people who is interested in addressing
these issues that really do need to be addressed nationally.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
For those of us that want to learn more about this, clearly
we can read your book and again that is “Blood that cries out from the earth”
any other resources for practitioners out there that want to learn more about
the role of religion in individual psychology?
DR. JAMES JONES:
There are lot of books coming out and my book has a good
bibliography if you go on Amazon and you look under books on religious
terrorism. I do think though that you want books that have been published
recently because I do think and this is controversial area, but so much of the
research, earlier research that was done on terrorism was done in the 60’s and
70’s with politically oriented groups in Europe, primarily and to some extent
in United States the Baader-Meinh of Gangor the Red Brigade, may be the weather
underground something like that, the IRA, but contemporary terrorism is a very
different phenomena and the models that we developed to understand those, much
more compact local groups I do not think are useful in the age of the
internet. The internet has changed the whole scope of terrorism now if you
were to show in itself. So, there are lot of books out, but I do encourage
people to read stuff that has come out in the 21st century since 9/11.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Thank you so much for being on our show today.
DR. JAMES JONES:
Well, I hope this has been helpful to you and to your
colleagues.
DR. LESLIE LUNDT:
Absolutely.
We have been speaking with Dr. James Jones about the
psychology of religious terrorism.
I am Dr. Leslie Lundt. You have been listening to our
special segment on disaster medicine on ReachMD XM 157, the channel for medical
professionals. To listen to our on-demand library, visit us at www.reachmd.com. If you register with the
promo code radio, you will receive 6 months’ of free streaming to your home or
your office. If you have comments or suggestions, give us a call at
888-MDXM-157. Thank you for listening.
Thank you for listening to ReachMD September medical
focus series disaster medicine and public health preparedness. Tune in each
hour at this time and hear insights from the nation’s top sought leaders as we
explore our nation’s progress since 9/11 and Katrina. Also, for your
convenience, all ReachMD XM 157 broadcasts are available on demand at www.reachmd.com.
I am Dr. Larry Kaskel, host of lipid luminations. Join
me for CME panel discussion sponsored by the National Lipid Association
examining the enhanced trial. Tune into ReachMD weekend CME as I welcome
leading experts, Dr. Evan Stein, Michael Davidson, Greg Brown, Jerome Cohen,
and Jennifer Robinson. This enhanced trial CME offers medical providers the
discussion of the important clinical trials affecting lipid management. The
leading experts will discuss the clinical implications of the ezetimibe and
simvastatin in hypercholesterolemia enhances atherosclerosis regression,
otherwise known as the enhanced trial, recently published in the April 2008 New
England Journal of Medicine and publicly presented at the Annual American
College of Cardiology Meeting in March. Join your colleagues for weekend CME
on ReachMD XM 157, the channel for medical professionals. To listen to
accredited programing online or to download as podcast, please visit www.reachmd.com/weekendcme.
You are listening to ReachMD XM 157, the channel for
medical professionals. Here is a sample of the great shows airing this week.
I am Dr. Matthew Sorrentino. Join me this week and I will be speaking with Dr.
Paul Iaizzo at the University of Minnesota. We will be discussing opioids,
fish oils, and hibernating bears. Thank you for listening to ReachMD XM 157
where we change topics every 15 minutes. For our complete weekly guest and
program guide, visit us at www.reachmd.com.