Platelets are critical to human survival. What is the
cutting edge platelet research and what clinical impact is it having? Welcome
to the clinicians roundtable. I am your host, Dr. Bruce Bloom and joining us
to discuss breakthroughs in platelet research is Dr. David J. Kuter, Chief of
Hematology at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. Dr. Kuter is a
board certified physician in Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Medical
Oncology and he chairs the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia subcommittee of the
NIH Network for Transfusion, Medicine, Hemostasis. He is also a professor of
medicine at Harvard Medical School.
HOST:
Dr. Bruce Bloom.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
Dr. Kuter, welcome to ReachMD.
DR. DAVID KUTER:
Thank you, Dr. Bloom. It is a pleasure to be with you today
to talk about these new areas.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
So when did the modern era of platelet research begin?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
It actually began very recently in 1994 when the molecule thrombopoietin
was discovered.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
So newer data suggests that platelet diseases are both
disorders of increased destruction and decreased production, how do we learn
that?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
Again, _____ primarily the condition called ITP or immune
thrombocytopenic purpura. We have learnt from, what I call, a platelet kinetic
studies that in patients with ITP, which has long been known to be associated
with antibodies that bind platelets and destroy them, we have learnt from
kinetic studies recently that those patients who we would have thought would
increase the rate of platelet production didn’t do so and hence most patients
who have ITP or platelets have been destroyed, have a situation where their
hope for compensation does not occur and most patients with ITP have a normal
or only slight increased rate of platelet production.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
What’s the molecule that regulates all this and what have
learnt about it recently?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
The molecule that has set us in a different track since 1994
was the discovery of thrombopoietin. Thrombopoietin is a 94,000 molecular
weight protein, which is made in the liver. It is made in the constant fashion
and it enters our circulations and it binds the target receptors called the thrombopoietin
receptor and bone marrow cells and that it promotes the growth of the precursor
cell megakaryocytes, which in turn make platelets.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
So why don’t we just find ways to increase the production of
thrombopoietin inside the body?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
Well, interestingly enough, the only hematopoietic growth
factor, which actually is regulated in our body in such a fashion is
erythropoietin. When we are anemic, we make more erythropoietin, but all the
other hematopoietic growth factors such as granulocyte colony stimulating
factor, monocyte colony stimulating factor – now thrombopoietin, are regulated
in a much different fashion. They are all made in a constant rate in our body,
thrombopoietin being made in a constant rate by the liver and nothing increases
or decreases the rate of production. The only exceptional make is if you have
liver disease and your liver is destroyed or partially destroyed say by
cirrhosis, your production of thrombopoietin drops dramatically and your
platelet count also drops.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
Can we think of an evolutionary reason why thrombopoietin
would be regulated in this way?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
I wish I could, I have been thinking about this for a number
of years. What I will tell you is in situations or animals where we knock out
the productional thrombopoietin, the platelet count drops down to a low level,
but not a level that is incompatible with life. So you can have animals and
also humans that have platelet counts about 1/10th of normal, which is what
happens when you don’t have thrombopoietin and these animals live totally
well. I suspect as we evolved as a fighting society and blood a lot, a higher
platelet count might have been more protective, but I can’t give you a good
answer for that.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
Are there other animal species that have a different kind of
thrombopoietin regulation?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
No, well, we have evolved almost all vertebrate species to
have platelets regulated in this fashion.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
So have we made an analogue of thrombopoietin and how does
it work?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
Yes, as soon as thrombopoietin was identified back in 1994,
within a year, 2 recombinant thrombopoietins were identified and they entered
clinical practice; one was a virtual replica of the endogenous native thrombopoietin
and the other was a portion of molecule that bound the receptor only that was
coupled to polyethylene glycol called PEG, anti-Tf and both of these had half
lives in a circulation of 40 hours, both rapidly made the platelet count rise
in animals and in humans who were human volunteers and they were tested in a
wide variety of situations.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
And are either one of those down in the market and are they
working right now?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
No, despite the fact that they showed a benefit in a number
of areas and in brief areas that they showed benefit in was chemotherapy-induced
thrombocytopenia, platelet apheresis donors, and a few patients with ITP, they
are not in the market now because one of the drug had antibodies developed
against it, the PEG imaged F molecule. What happened is those antibodies bound
the recombinant product, but then also cross reacted with the native molecule
and since we make the native molecule with constant rate, we effectively
knocked out production of thrombopoietin. So these early experiments that were
done that show benefit from thrombopoietin were stopped about 1998 or up to
2000 because of the antibody issue.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
And has the scientific community made different kinds of new
analogues and how are they working?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
Yes, because of the benefit that we saw with the early
molecules, we felt that we could make a non-immunogenic molecule that would
have clinical benefit and this also allowed chemists and scientists to develop
different kinds of thrombopoietic molecules. One type was to make a peptide,
which was activating the thrombopoietin receptor, but did not have the same
amino acid sequences to the native molecule. Hence if an antibody was made
against this new peptide, it would not cross react and knock out the endogenous
thrombopoietin production and several such peptides were made. They were then
inserted in a different carrier molecule to prolong the half life and one of
these called romiplostim is currently FDA approved for the treatment of ITP.
Other areas of investigation identified small chemicals, which are not orally
available that bound the thrombopoietin receptor and activated it and these
molecules are in clinical development right now and finally you can make
monoclonal antibodies that bind the thrombopoietin receptor and activate it and
increase the platelet count and these are also being developed at a much slower
rate by several pharmaceutical companies.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
You mentioned that romiplostim is on the market now. When
was it approved and when do you think it will get wide scale use?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
Romiplostim was approved in August of 2008; it is a molecule
which was studied primarily in ITP and it is currently approved for ITP. The
brand name is Nplate and the generic name is romiplostim. It was developed
under the name AMG 531. It is a molecule, which showed major benefit in
treating ITP patients with more than 88% of patients responding to it in the
clinical trial that lasted for 24 weeks. This molecule is now available and is
being used by practitioners to treat patients with refractory ITP currently.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
And did it work for both splenectomized and
non-splenectomized patients?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
Yes, that’s what is striking about this molecule. It worked
almost as well in splenectomized patients who had received up to 6 prior
treatment regimens and failed them as they did in patients who did not get them
splenectomized with response rates being about 78% in the splenectomized group
and 88% in those who had not yet been splenectomized. The response rates also
lasted for a long time. In patients on our 24-week trial, most patients
maintained a platelet count, which previously had been below 30,000 and was now
above 50,000 most of the time. In open label studies, which followed those
initial phase 3 studies, we have had patients now out on these molecules for 3
or 4 years with stable control over platelet count over 80% of the time, so
these molecules work in a short period of time over 24 weeks on 1 clinical trial
and now on a very long open label trial, they have been showing efficacy to 156
months.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
What else has this drug done for patients with ITP besides
increased their platelet counts?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
There are many things that ITP patients want? One of their
concern is about a higher platelet count and as I mentioned this drug increased
the platelet count and quite dramatically maintained it. The second thing ITP
patients want to do is come off their concomitant therapies such as steroids
and immunosuppressive agents and it was dramatic about our study is that in the
splenectomized group, for example, a 100% of patients who have been on steroids
either discontinued or reduced their steroid dose versus only 17% of patients
who are in the placebo group of patients. Furthermore the patients with ITP
tend to have their platelet counts wax and wane, they rise and fall from time
to time and patients require what are called rescue medications; things like IVIG
and anti-D that transiently increase the platelet count and the use of such
rescue medications dropped dramatically by almost two-thirds in patients who
received the romiplostim drug versus those who received placebo.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
It is the only reason for us to believe that this will not
be durable for these patients?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
I think right now in the studies we have done with patients
now 3 or 4 years in these molecules, there has been no suggestion of tachyphylaxis
or loss of response. There had been a few long-term potential risks identified
and those are being monitored very closely in our ongoing clinical trials.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
And what are those side effects and what are the less severe
ones that patients experience as well?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
From romiplostim, the major minor side effect is this is a
subcutaneous injection usually given once a week and most patients have no
trouble with this. It certainly pales in comparison to getting prednisone
everyday at rather toxic doses. Many patients, perhaps a third had a mild
headache within several hours of receiving administration and those of the two
minor side effects had occurred. Another issue that did appear on our clinical
trials particularly when we stopped the drug is this is a therapy that boosts
the platelet production, but does not affect the concurrent platelet
destruction, so as soon as you stop stimulating platelet production, the
platelet count falls and in about a 4 of 56 patients in one study, the platelet
count actually fell below their prior baseline and it took a couple of weeks
for it to return back to their prior baseline. This did not result in any bad
clinical sequelae, but stopping these molecules in ITP is not a wise idea, at
least doing abruptly. Another concern, which came out of our clinical trials
is the occurrence of what is called reticulin in the bone marrow. Now
reticulin, which is a type of collagen that is identified by a silver staining
technique, which was created 100 years ago, actually is present in two-thirds
of normal individuals. In ITP patients, it is probably present to the same
extent. In 10 out of over 200 patients, we have studied this reticulin
appeared to be increasing a bit in some of these patients. It did not appear
to cause them to have any hematologic abnormalities, but again it is something,
which we are studying right now to see if there is any long-term sequelae of
reticulin formation. Why might this be of concern, it is of concern because
many physicians associate reticulin formation with a clonal bone marrow disease
called myelofibrosis and I think what’s probably important to state right now
is the administration of this class of drugs to ITP patients does not appear to
cause the disease myelofibrosis, but simply an increase in reticulin, which is
reversible.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
Can these treatments that are now being used for ITP be used
in any other platelet disorders like myelodysplastic syndrome or
thrombocytopenia due to hepatitis C?
DR. DAVID KUTER:
Yes, and I think this is where a lot of great excitement
occurs right now. I think that in MDS patients, a small trial done at the M.D.
Anderson Hospital and elsewhere showed that about half of patients who received
romiplostim for a month had their platelet count rise above 50,000. This did
not seem to have any effect upon bleeding risks, but the major concern that was
found in most studies was some patients had increase in blast percentage, which
has given us some pause in these studies. There are ongoing studies that are
just about to be started as well looking at the use of romiplostim in MDS
patients who are getting concurrent chemotherapy. I think the major area for
these drugs might be in hepatitis C thrombocytopenia as you know hepatitis C is
a very common condition in our country, thrombocytopenia also commonly ensues
and if the platelet count is less than 70,000 in some of these individuals,
anti-retroviral therapy which may be curative to hepatitis C is often not given
or at least complicated by the thrombocytopenia and using a different thrombopoietic
agent called eltrombopag, which is a small molecule, distinct in structure and
different from romiplostim, it was shown in a very nice clinical trial that
platelet counts could be brought into the normal range with oral administration
of this drug, eltrombopag and the patients then could undertake and successfully
complete antiretroviral therapy over the next 12 weeks.
DR. BRUCE BLOOM:
I would like to thank our guest, Dr. David J. Kuter, Chief
of Hematology at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and Professor of
Medicine at the Harvard Medical School, for joining us to discuss breakthroughs
in platelet research. You have been listening to the clinicians roundtable on
ReachMD, a channel for medical professionals. For a complete program guide and
podcast, visit www.reachmd.com and thank
you for listening.
You are listening to ReachMD, the channel for medical
professionals. This week ReachMD is moving to XM channel 160. Please make a
note and tell your associates and friends. ReachMD, the nation’s channel for
medical professionals will now be on XM160 and thank you for listening.