NEW TRENDS IN EMS
MANAGEMENT
Evidence based medicine has changed resuscitation in the
field and in the ED. How well do you know the new tools in the trade? I am
your host Dr. Shira Johnson and joining us today to discuss what is new in EMS
is Dr. Chris Colwell from Denver Health Medical Center. Dr. Colwell is an
Associate Director in the Department Of Emergency Medicine and he is Medical
Director of the Denver Paramedic and Fire Department.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
Dr. Colwell welcome to ReachMD.
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
Thank you, thank you for having me today.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
So in all the years that you have been teaching and
practicing prehospital care, tell us some of the ways that it's changed.
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
Well, I think prehospital care and emergency care has
changed dramatically in the last 10 or 15 years and I think in particularly we
talked about EMS and we focused on pre-hospital issues, what we have done that
I think is very exciting is that we have started the challenge the mantra that
we have always lived by. So if you talk to EMS providers and medical directors
20 years ago, there were certain things that they said this is core of EMS.
This is the core what we do and really always, but particularly recently we
have challenged some of that mantra, some of things that we were doing does it
makes sense under what circumstances and I think that is made for some exciting
updates and changes.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
What's one of the biggest advances or changes that we have
seen in the way we administer CPR?
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
Well CPR has gotten quite a bit of attention particularly in
the last several years and I think what we have started to learn is that way
back when we emphasized CPR, we were probably right to do that and as we
de-emphasize CPR as we moved along may be that was a wrong direction to go.
More recent articles have really emphasized good CPR and good early CPR may be
the most important thing in terms of survival for the patients that have undergone
cardiac arrest. We sometimes get too bogged down with 4 and 5 and 6 hour
training courses for CPR, it does not need to be that difficult. Fast 100
compressions a minute, do it first, do it often, if you are doing it well, we
may have more impact on saving lives and essentially anything else we do other
than perhaps electricity.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
With the changes in CPR and I guess I am referring to we are
doing more compressions and less ventilation have we in terms of numbers or
have you personally either 1 seen a resultant change in survival and outcome.
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
Both I think the most impressive data is what's been
published in this area and it started with a Norway study back in 2003.
Actually, some Seattle studies that looked at this earlier than that, but it
really generated some excitement in 2003 when they found that doing CPR first
even before we looked at what rhythm the patient was in and before we
considered electricity in the unwitnessed cardiac arrest and when it wasn't
witnessed by prehospital providers it really resulted in increased survival and
studies that have come out recently since then have reemphasized that issue and
when you have instituted a 2-minute of CPR before doing anything else in the
unwitnessed cardiac arrest we are saving lives and this is resulting in having
more patients walk out of the hospital neurologically intact then when we were
not doing that.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
I guess the numbers of unwitnessed cardiac arrest prodismal,
I mean there is 0 or in the negative.
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
They have been bad and is not like we have been able to
turnout round and now they look good, but they certainly are looking much
better when we are paying attention to detail such as when we do CPR and how
well we do it. We are still not doing it well, consistently enough.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
What about the role of hypothermia after a cardiac arrest?
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
So this has been an interesting development really over the
last several years. There was 2 articles published in New England Journal of
Medicine in 2002 that looked at therapeutic hypothermia in specific cases of
patients who were found to be cardiac arrest, resuscitated from that and had
return of spontaneous circulation, but did not return their neurologic
recovery. In other words they remained comatosed even though they had
spontaneous circulation and in those groups of patients particularly if they had
an initial witnessed ventricular fibrillation they seemed to do better and
survive in higher numbers when therapeutic hypothermia was instituted. So a
lot of institutions either in the ED or certainly in the ICU have instituted
this idea and are doing this. The question is whether or not EMS should be
doing it and I think the answer to that is we probably should not because it
needs to be done immediately both of studies and study since have suggested
that if its instituted within an hour may be 105 minutes is what the 1 study
looked at and certainly by 6 hours have the patients cooled then you may get
your impact. So doing it in the pre-hospital setting, when you only have
10-minute response times isn't necessarily where we are going to make our difference,
but I am a firm believer that if we are able to institute something like this
in the field it sends a message (a) that we have identified this patient as a
potential candidate for this and (b) once its started its much easier for
hospital to continue that process and I think that's what exciting about
prehospital potentially doing this and they are doing that in some areas in the
country.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
What's new in airway management that may be our listeners
don't already know?
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
There is a lot of interest focused on airway management and
a lot of debate as to whether airway should be managed in the field and if so
under what circumstances and should be using medications to assist in this
rapid frequent intubation those types of things and there is debate and
virtually everyone of those areas. What I think we are really progressing in
is alternatives to airway management. First of all we are learning the good
skills are important and secondly we have some more tools that are disposal
now. So things like CPAP is much more universally used now in the field than
it ever has been. BiPAP is still probably a little too expensive and I haven't
seen that a whole lot, but I have seen lots of areas where CPAP has been
introduced and it has resulted and we have some studies now that are showing
that it result in fewer intubations in the field and better outcomes. We also
have other alternatives in terms of rescue airway devices. So, things like the
Combitube, like the LMA, like what we are using in Denver which is the King
airway can be very effective in terms of ventilating patients and although its
not a definitive airway it may accomplish everything that we need to accomplish
in the field and having these other alternative should be considered and should
be offered in many cases incorporated into prehospital practices. Not as
necessary the only thing, but certainly as an option.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
That’s a big change. CPAP used to be a last resort while
you are waiting on anesthesia in the ER on the floor and now you are suggesting
it should be a first resort and should be taken into the field.
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
I think absolutely, in fact we are doing it in the field now
in Denver have had wonderful results. Its not on all respiratory patients
obviously, its on reactive airways disease, COPD, asthma, CHF patients those
types of things, but we have had success similar to what the published articles
have shown in terms of fewer intubations and better outcomes.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
If you are just tuning in, you are listening to The
Clinician's Round Table. I am your host, Dr. Shira Johnson, and joining me
today is Dr. Chris Colwell from Denver Health Medical Center who is also the
medical director for the Denver EMS System.
Let's talk about drugs, have we expanded the toolbox of meds
used by our paramedics in the field. What drugs have had newfound success?
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
We have expanded the toolbox fairly significantly.
Sometimes with very good results. Sometimes with perhaps not as good results
as we had hoped for expected and we have done it in many areas as well. Things
like emesis treatment for nausea and vomiting in the field were as for long
time, I didn't use any thing or when we did use it, it had some really
significant downsides of sedation, dystonic reactions those types of things.
We are now seeing studies that in particular ondansetron since it has become generic
and is now much less expensive has very few side effects such as sedation or
dystonic reactions, its not expensive. Some people have argued how effective
is it. My personal anecdotal experience is that it has been very effective. I
know some of the studies haven't been overwhelming, but they certainly have
found it to be reasonable and I think it is a nice new option in that in
particular it doesn't have the side effects that we have traditionally seen
with antiemetics.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
And you have it available to your paramedics.
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
We do we are using ondansetron in the field in Denver and I
know a lot of places across the country that are using it as well.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
Adenosine has always been 1 of my favorite drugs. Can you
tell our listeners who may not this how it's used in the field if it's used in
the field, its role in the ER?
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
It is used in the field and its gotten some interesting
attention of late and particularly there have been some questions as to how
accurately we are using it in the field and how there are times when perhaps we
shouldn't be using that we have been and I think more importantly we do have it
in Denver and I know lot of systems that do have and I think it is appropriate
to have it in the prehospital setting, but I think what the articles are doing
is a very good thing in terms of they are reminding us that there are some
downsides to adenosine. It's not a completely infallible drug. Its not
something that can be used with impunity all the time and there is something we
really need to be thinking and critically evaluating how we are using it, under
what circumstances, how certain are we that we have good identifiable rhythm
that we are treating and what situations is it particularly effective and what
it has not been good idea to use that in the field and I think we need to
question that about everything we do. There are not so much can way because a
lot of our literature has focused on can this be done on the field, I believe
just about anything can be done on the field, but next question to me is more
important should we and I think there are sometimes when adenosine is
appropriate to use in the field, but there are also sometimes when its not and
we need to be careful about differentiating that.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
You advised with medical control sake have your paramedics a
rapid rhythm undiagnosed, but it is give adenosine to see if it will work, to
see if this flutter wave, to use it diagnostically in the field or you try to
stress that they use it to treat.
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
No I think it really is more appropriately used in my
opinion for treatment. For diagnosis that something that can be done often
more effectively in the emergency department not because we are going to do
something differently, but we can often have a situation where we can more
clearly document exactly what the underlying rhythm is and I am not sure how
often we do it just purely diagnostically anyway, but I think in the field I am
not sure there is a real indication to do it just a kind of see what happens.
I think we need to be very clear as to what rhythm we are treating and why we
are using adenosine.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
They call it in and they have to get permission to use
adenosine or your guys go and use it.
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
They don't, they do have a flexibility to use as a standing
order although we do view all those calls and I have got to say our experience
is very similar to some of the published literature that is suggestive that in
the up to 20% of the cases its not necessarily being used in the right setting.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
What about magnesium. What are some of the ways that choose
prehospital?
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
Well its been used in a number of different ways and we in
medicine, I would say this is emergency medicine and prehospital, have searched
for the right use for magnesium for so long I think we are all anxious to find
a niche for magnesium because its inexpensive, its easy to give, it does not
have very many side effects. We have searched so hard for reason for magnesium
and I am not sure we have found a good indication just yet. We have used in
reactive airways disease although there is not a whole lot of data behind
that. We have used it in strokes and we know we can use it effectively, but we
are not showing any real benefit from it and that at least not yet. We used it
in eclampsia and that probably is a reasonable use for that rare eclamptic
patient that we have although in Europe. They have questioned that data as
well so we are still searching for the real indication for magnesium.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
What about the interosseous routesorted out just for
peds and where are we with that today?
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
I think this is a real exciting advancement in prehospital
medicine because we are using now in a lot of different systems including
Denver, a bone gun essentially for interosseous access in both peds and adult.
It's much better than the old systems that we have used for interosseous
access. I think it's far better than trying 3, 4, 5, 10 times for IV access
when you just can't get it in a patient who is really sick. I am not sure we
should be using it in the awake alert patients that could use IV access, but
don’t necessarily have it. I think it should be reserved for the situations
where we really need it, but it’s a wonderful opportunity now for access in the
patients that we didn't have very good access before both in the prehospital
and in the emergency department.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
That’s question. So physicians who are listening to us
today and they want to follow up on some of the topics that we just touched on,
where can we tell them to get more information?
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
If anybody has anything that they would like comments on
that I can help with, I can either give them some of the answers that I have
found or direct them to places or people that can. My email is ccolwell@dhha.org and I will be more than
happy to help either find some of the things that people look in for, direct
them the literature that I have found helpful in trying to come over some of
these answers or direct them to people that can come up with some of these
answers for them.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
We want to thank you very much for being on this show today.
DR. CHRIS COLWELL:
Thank you very much for having me.
DR. SHIRA JOHNSON:
We have had Dr. Chris Colwell today joining us to discuss
new trends in EMS management and what you don't know could hurt you.
You have been listening to the Clinician’s Roundtable on
ReachMD, The Channel for Medical Professionals. For a complete program guide
and pod casts, visit www.reachmd.com. For comments or questions, call us toll
free at 888 MD XM 157 and thank you as always for listening.