THE ASSESSMENT OF
SUICIDE RISK IN COLLEGE STUDENTS.
You are listening to Reach MD, the channel for medical
professionals. Every suicide leaves heartache for family, friends and
community. For detecting the warning before suicide and taking effective
actions to prevent a suicide are not always easy. One program that is
attempting to find and help college students who are considered high risk for
suicide attempts is the college-screening project, a web-based outreach
program. Welcome to the Clinician’s Roundtable. I am Dr. Cathleen Margolin
and joining me from Atlanta, Georgia is psychiatrist Steven Garlow.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
Welcome Dr. Garlow.
STEVEN GARLOW:
Thank you. It is a pleasure to be here.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
Dr. Garlow, in your recent article published in the Journal
of American College Help, you and your colleagues studied an interactive
web-based method of outreach to college students at risk for suicide. Tell us
about the college-screening project.
STEVEN GARLOW:
This was a noble program developed by American Foundation
for Suicide Prevention in conjunction with a number of psychiatrists with the
goal of reaching out to college students to identify students at risk for
depression and for suicide, and to encourage them to come into treatment and
what we utilized was a technology method of communication that is very
comfortable to modern college students and that was e-mail and web-based
interaction, so how the system work is all students or the undergraduates would
receive an e-mail inviting them to participate in this program, as the tag line
or ask are you depressed and then it would explain what is the method and
explain the details. They could go to a secure website setup in their own
account essentially and complete a screening questionnaire that included
symptoms of depression, suicidal ideation, strong emotional state and things
like that. That was then transmitted in a secure way anonymously, which I
think the anonymity is one of key elements in it, anonymously to a therapist.
We then do a review and communicate the results back to the students.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
So, it was more than just a simple online survey where they
get some kind of score and there was a human element there.
STEVEN GARLOW:
The difference between this and other types of computerized
assessment tools is that this involve every case was reviewed by a therapist,
by a trained therapist who review their scores from this questionnaire and the
responses and had a method specifically targeted to each individual and the
other unique aspect of this system is that there was anonymous dialogue feature
that the student could then communicate back to the therapist anonymously and
that there was a live interaction. It is a different thing selling out a form
and the computer telling you, you looks like you are depressed, you should seek
treatment or something like that, I am there is a real life interaction between
the students and the therapist.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
And, what did you find?
STEVEN GARLOW:
We found that well, 8% of the students participated
responded and surprisingly in all of these students there was a very high
degree of untreated depression, 16% of them had made a previous suicide
attempt, about 8% were currently suicidal and expressed current suicidal
ideation. We find a number of relationships, some of which were obvious so
that the more severely depressed a person was the more likely they were to have
suicidal ideation, but the other thing we found that there was an association
between the strong emotional state, a sense of desperation in particular, a
sense of question with do you feel out of control or desperate, anxious or
stressed, angry, all of these types of strong emotional states related to but
not exactly depression, they all also were highly associated with the students
who are having the most significant suicidal ideation.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
Tell us about the diagnosis that the students did meet
criteria for.
STEVEN GARLOW:
Depression, major depressive disorder was the main one and
versions of depression without having clinical diagnostic interviews, it is
hard to give exact diagnosis for many of these students, but certainly the PHQ9
which was the central element in the questionnaire, a score of 15 and above is
a high likelihood of diagnosing depression and tell this question was initially
developed and so those students most likely made a diagnosis of major
depressive disorder.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
And major depressive disorder is a pretty serious condition
who walk around untreated.
STEVEN GARLOW:
Correct and of those students had the most severe depression
85% were not in any supportive treatment whatsoever. The other remarkable
thing about this was that these students were suffering in silence, these
students were suffering alone, and you can read this in some of the dialogues
that they thought that this was just unique to them or there was not any help,
there was not any way him understanding this. They're very reluctant to seek
out treatment, to come in for treatment, to admit that they're in pain, to
admit that they are suffering. The most important part of this method of this
way of reaching out to student is it takes away the onus of coming in for some
kind of face-to-face meeting, at least initially and saying some that may be
embarrassing or may be painful to say to some other person. By doing it
through the computer that in anonymity, I think in some ways freed these
students to be more open and honest and were forthright with the clinician.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
Where these numbers and the severity of symptoms a surprise
to the researchers?
STEVEN GARLOW:
Yeah, they were definitely surprised. To us the severity,
the frequency of previous suicide attempts, the frequency of current suicide
ideation, severity of the depression, untreated depression, all these things
were certainly surprising to me and my discussions with research team. It has
been very sobering. It is very humbling to think that there is this degree of
pain and suffering and would just barely enough to figuring out ways to
majority of these students and bring then into treatment.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
Yes, that also must be validating what you are trying to do
is obviously worthwhile.
STEVEN GARLOW:
And there is some other research that says that the most at
risk students are the other ones that feel socially isolated, that are less
likely to come into treatment and so through this computer message that comes
to them where they're it overcomes that social embarrassment, the social
awkwardness, the social stigma, the social inhibition to come in for treatment
by coming through this communication method that college students now probably
universally utilize e-mail and text messaging and web messaging and things like
that. It is a way of overcoming social isolation and getting at those most in
need.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
It is not necessarily as though they were waiting though for
someone to ask. A lot of these students reported significant depression, but
denied that it was interfering with their day-to-day functioning and that has
to be surprising?
STEVEN GARLOW:
That is surprising, but but that's you know, invincibility
of youth and in some of the dialogues, and some of the interactions, they would
say, well, this is just normal, right? There would be some quote like that and
people until it is pointed out, until it is explained to many people that how
their feeling isn't normal and it is not okay to feel this way, you do not have
to feel this way, people will ascribe it to, well I am under a lot of stress
because I have to work and go to school, my classes are very hard, I am
pre-med, I am pretty alone, I have to do well and my parents have all these
expectations or people will ascribe how they're feeling to some external cause but
in fact it is really internal to them and but because they have done that,
because they said well I am under all this pressure because of my classes, they
tolerate how they're feeling because, well that is just how everybody feels in
this circumstance and that is one of things with this communication, the
therapist can actually can let that student know, no, this is not the way you
should feel. You do not have to feel this way.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
If you have just joined us, you are listening to ReachMD,
the channel for medical professionals. I am Dr. Cathleen Margolin and my guest
is psychiatrist, Steven Garlow and we're discussing the assessment of suicide
risk in college students.
Dr. Garlow, so when these students have normalized these
feelings and dismissed them and they're not seeking treatment, if they do go
for a checkup or find themselves in the company of a physician, this makes it
very difficult for the physician to try to make an assessment. Doesn't it?
STEVEN GARLOW:
Right, and this is where we have to be available open and
forthright in asking the students about this, asking young people about this,
ask about depression, ask how they're feeling, and be willing then to deal with
what the answer is. We have to be prepared for that, but if we do not ask
people about, if we do not ask students about it, the student comes in for
something that might see minor, it is worth asking a sleep disturbance, a
chronic headache, something like that. It is absolutely in their interest to
ask about depression, ask explicitly about signs of depression, ask explicitly
about suicide risks, ask explicitly have you been thinking about killing
yourself? If we do not ask these questions explicitly, who are not comfortable
as physicians asking these questions, we will never get the information from
our patients and if we're forthright about it, it makes it easier then for our
patients, for our students to be forthright back with us.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
And back to the study, what kind of response was given to
the students who were medium-to-high risk for suicide and did not participate
in evaluation and treatment.
STEVEN GARLOW:
Repeated messages came from the study therapist to this
anonymous e-mail service encouraging them to come into treatment, trying to
dialogue with them, trying to engage them one way or another. We had to follow
up on some, some actually had sought treatment elsewhere, some had gotten
better just in the process of interacting with the therapist online, so we
never knew what acutely happened with, that is the nature of this kind of
study, but the therapist would send multiple messages, encouraging messages, to
try to get that person into treatment.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
So, would you think that the online dialogue itself was
therapeutic?
STEVEN GARLOW:
There seem to be for some of these students something in
their interaction with the clinician, somebody who is listening to them,
somebody who is paying attention to them, not just a computer, not just a
computer questionnaire, but somebody on the other end who was responding to
them and addressing their needs, and responding to their concerns and if one
reads some of the dialogues, it is very clear there is something like a
therapeutic process going on where there is relief of anxiety, where there is
relief of stress, where there is some resolution on the part of the student.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
Let us talk about the sex differences that were found. More
women participated and sought treatment, but males are at a much greater risk
to die from suicide. Aren't they?
STEVEN GARLOW:
Yes, that is absolutely correct. When women are more likely
to have depression, women are more likely to seek treatment than men. This is
one of the unmet need, this is what discontinuities in this that we're trying
to overcome, trying to find other ways of engaging the male students into
getting into treatment, and so we have actually been considering different ways
as we move forward with this method of changing the approach, changing the
questions we ask to try to may be move the language into so that we're more
comfortable or more familiar to the male students that might help them come
into treatment. Ultimately, coming into psychiatric treatment or not is at
least in part about perception, about their perception stigma, about
individuals who have an idea what it means to see a psychiatrist, they have an
idea of what it would mean to their career, what it would mean to their status
and to school, what it would mean to their relationships with their friends and
their family and overcoming those kinds of issues that is one of the places
where the dialogue would, I think, had some impact with being able to address
some of those issues. It has been thought that the suicide risk in males is in
part due to the reluctance to seek treatment, to reluctance to admit to being
in pain, to admit to needing help. So, that is one of the challenges to male
health practitioners in a college setting, but actually everywhere.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
This outreach program seems like a great idea. What does
the future look like? Will it become a routine intervention on college
campuses, do you think?
STEVEN GARLOW:
What we're trying to develop in at AFSP, The American
Foundation for Suicide Prevention, are we're actually moving it up to have it,
we're going to sort of widen the implementation to aide institutions including
a couple of medical schools coming up. We will sort of add a tipping point to
try to enlarge it and bring it to, to like you said to try to make it more of a
routine part of the mental health program at any school and expand it and
generalize it to more institutions, that is my goal, that is the right thing I
think we need to take it, that being said it is not the only solution. Any
university needs to have a multilayered, a multi-model approach to suicide
prevention. There needs to be anti-stigma campaigns, there needs to be
multiple avenues of outreach. There needs to be something like the college
screening project that provides the door into the e-mail, internet-based
process. That is going to get some students at risk, but there are other kinds
of outreach methods, other kinds of anti-stigma campaigns that are going to
contact and touch other students and bring other students in the treatment, but
it is definitely a part of a comprehensive suicide prevention program on a
college campus.
DR. CATHLEEN MARGOLIN:
Well, it sounds very promising and it is a very creative
approach. I wish you luck with it.
STEVEN GARLOW:
Thank you.
Thank you for listening to the Clinician’s Roundtable on
ReachMD, the channel for medical professionals. I am Dr. Cathleen Margolin and
my guest has been psychiatrist, Steven Garlow of the Department of Psychiatry
and Behavioral Sciences at Emory University School of Medicine. Thank you for
joining me, Dr. Garlow.
STEVEN GARLOW:
Thank you.
You are listening to Reach MD, XM160, the channel for
medical professionals.