You are listening to Reach MD, The Channel for Medical Professionals. Welcome to advances in Women's Health. Your host is Dr. Lisa Mazzulo, assistant professor of Obstetrics And Gynecology at Northwestern University Medical School, the Feinberg School of Medicine.
You are listening to Reach MD, The Channel for Medical Professionals. Welcome to advances in Women’s Health. I am Dr. Lisa Mazzulo, your host and with me today is Marilyn Keefe, Director of Reproductive Health Rights at National Partnership for Women And Family. She is a keen leader in the implementation of legal and policy strategy for quality care and reproductive health in the United States.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
Welcome Moroline
Thank you, its wonderful to be here today.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
Well, it’s a very exciting time to talk about personal trace meeting public policy and I thought maybe we should start out just talking about some of the things that happened on November 4th this year related to reproductive health policy.
DR. MARILYN KEEFE:
November 4th was an excellent day for reproductive health. There were number of state valid initiatives related to reproductive health issues and some very good results coming out of those notes in terms of support for reproductive health. Obviously, there was pro-choice candidate versus an anti-choice candidate. Obviously, the pro-choice candidate won, so I think going into this next cycle we are going to have a more pro-choice Congress. We have got some pro-choice valid initiatives that were passed on November 4th,so I think we are looking at a very different political environment than the one that we had been functioning in for the last 8 years.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
A breath of fresh air for a while.
DR. MARILYN KEEFE:
Absolutely.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
Can you talk a little bit about the valid initiative that has been past November for?
DR. MARILYN KEEFE:
Well, there were number of valid initiative across the country that really threatened to violate women’s privacy and health. I am sure when that some listeners are familiar with within Colorado what was being referred to as the fetal personhoodinitiative and that defeated by an amazing 3 to 1 margin. It was preposterous initiative that tries to amend the state constitution to give fertilized eggs if you can believe that prior to implantation, the same rights and legal protections that apply once people are born that threaten to ban widely accepted forms of contraception including the IUD and the pill. It could have curtailed medical research involving embryos, it could have shattered fertility clinics, criminalize a lot of different kinds of necessary medical care including the right to abortion, so you had even the anti-choice governor of Colorado coming out against that initiative.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
Its remarkable move to meet at people in Colorado whoever is responsible for trying to pass that law, what do you think that that was going to be a reality?
DR. MARILYN KEEFE:
Its true, I mean it was announced in a big way on the one hand. On the other hand, we keep hearing that there is going to be a renewed effort depressed for this same kind of initiative and that there will be efforts in 17 states believe it or not in the next election to try and enact the same kind of legislation.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
It is remarkable to me how many states actually do participate, that is even in South Dakota, I think one of the other valid initiative you probably want to talk about is they have now 3 times in the last 10 years tried to get a ban on abortion of all types.
DR. MARILYN KEEFE:
Right, and I think we were quite delighted when that initiative was defeated by a vote of 55% to 45% with a repeat of the 2006 valid initiative to ban abortion and I think that the real hope behind that had been to pass that valid initiative and then pass out via challenge to row the way. I mean voters have rejected the same thing 2 years ago, but backers of the banhad modified the line, which just show that it included very minimal exceptions for infant's weight and life and even the health exception was extremely limited. It was very narrowly drawn saying that its only in cases in which there is a substantial or irreversible risk of harm, so even in constructing a health exception, its really basically banned abortion.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
Do you think in the optimism of Obama taking over hopefully a new pro-choice venue in Washington then we can foresee a time when the decision about abortion I think like it don't today belong to state or federal government.
DR. MARILYN KEEFE:
Well, I mean I think, although there has been a great deal of gains in this last election in terms of support for choice and for family planning and for reproductive right to cast the board, there is still some way to go in terms of having a totally pro-choice Congress, so I think there will be a huge focus on prevention on family planning, on getting little funding for dangerous ineffective abstinence only program, funding for international family planning programs. I think you are going to see huge policy changes on the one hand. On the other hand, I do not think that there will be a huge numbers of bills that really address the abortion issue that we have seen in the last 8 years.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
As such speaking of that what is the legacy of abortion administration and its effort to regulate women’s access to reproductive health care.
DR. MARILYN KEEFE:
Well, I think you have seen very little investment in some primary preventative health care program, for example the Title X Family Planning Program that gives money to about 4400 clinics across the nation, but finding has been stagnant notwithstanding the fact that there had been increases in health care across the board both for contraceptives for medicine supplies, for health care personnel you name it, but this is a program that very much has been allowed to languish. You haven’t seen the extensions in family planning under the medicaid program that make sense to have family planning as both basic healthcare for women, but it is also a cost effective service, and so we are hoping in the next administration, there will be much more of a focus both on preventive health services like that, but also services that save the government money.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
Ya, its interesting when you look at things like that, many of the medicare medicaid in general private insurers do not often encourage preventive health which is kind of counterintuitive because if you prevent the problem, it's going to be much cheaper than paying for the ramifications of it and that common sense would seem clear to a second grader.
DR. MARILYN KEEFE:
I couldn't agree more and I am hoping what happens in this next administration is much more of a focus on evidence and one thing we can look at are the cost savings associated with some of these preventative health care services, and so hopefully will be a much greater investment.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
Do you think there are any other legacy issues from the Bush administration regarding reproductive health?
DR. MARILYN KEEFE:
I think, he has still got the ban on federal funding of most human embryonic stem cell research. That clearly is going to be lifted before the administration representative talk over and over again about the fact that this is something that is likely to change at the very beginning of the next administration. I think there has been a lot of talk about lifting the global gag rule that has prevented US dollars from going to non-governmental organizations that provide international family planning services, to some of the poorest women around the world, of those organizations provide abortion services or even give information about abortion. So I think that something that the next administration will be taking care of right out of the box.
DR. LISA MAZZULO:
If you are just joining us, you are listening to advances in Women Health on Reach MD and we are taking to Marilyn Keefe, director of the reproductive health rights at national partnership for women and family about some of the exciting policy changes that may be having in reproductive health in these next 4 years. So, Moroline do you think that there are any expected changes in the Supreme Court or Federal Court under Obama that may want itself to an improvement in overall reproductive health for women.
DR. MARILYN KEEFE:
Oh, I think support is of reproductive right-sided. We had this sigh of relief last week and I should say that I have worked for a non-partition organization on the one hand. On the other hand, I am very much an advocate for women’s health and women’s right. So, we recognized that the Supreme Court is an incredibly important body in the United States. We are likely to still retain that 5-4 splitthat we hear about so often with regard to reproductive rights. The people who are likely to retire first out of the Supreme Court are those who are supportive of abortion rights since though the balance is likely to stay the same for the next few years. This balance would obviously change very dramatically had those some people retired and John McCain been in a position to appoint the next members of the Supreme Court, I mean he was very clearly going to appoint anti-choice members.
