menu

Proactive vs. Reactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab in Crohn’s Disease

Be part of the knowledge.
Register

We’re glad to see you’re enjoying ReachMD…
but how about a more personalized experience?

Register for free

Proactive vs. Reactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab in Crohn’s Disease

close
ReachMD Healthcare Image
Restart
Resume
Read full article
Choose a format
Media formats available:
A pre-test is required to view this content.
A pre-survey is required to view this content.
Details
Presenters
Comments
  • In Collaboration with

  • Overview

    Proactive Vs Reactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab in Crohn’s 

    Diana M NegoescuEva A Enns, PhD, Brooke SwanhorstBonnie BaumgartnerJames P CampbellMark T Osterman, MDKonstantinos Papamichael, PhDAdam S Cheifetz, MDByron P Vaughn, MD

    Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly performed for Infliximab (IFX) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Reactive TDM is a cost-effective strategy to empiric IFX dose escalation. The cost-effectiveness of proactive TDM is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of proactive vs reactive TDM in a simulated population of CD patients on IFX.

    Methods: We developed a stochastic simulation model of CD patients on IFX and evaluated the expected health costs and outcomes of a proactive TDM strategy compared with a reactive strategy. The proactive strategy measured IFX concentration and antibody status every 6 months, or at the time of a flare, and dosed IFX to a therapeutic window. The reactive strategy only did so at the time of a flare.

    Results: The proactive strategy led to fewer flares than the reactive strategy. More patients stayed on IFX in the proactive vs reactive strategy (63.4% vs 58.8% at year 5). From a health sector perspective, a proactive strategy was marginally cost-effective compared with a reactive strategy (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $146,494 per quality-adjusted life year), assuming a 40% of the wholesale price of IFX. The results were most sensitive to risk of flaring with a low IFX concentration and the cost of IFX.

    Conclusions: Assuming 40% of the average wholesale acquisition cost of biologic therapies, proactive TDM for IFX is marginally cost-effective compared with a reactive TDM strategy. As the cost of infliximab decreases, a proactive monitoring strategy is more cost-effective.

Facebook Comments

Recommended
Details
Presenters
Comments
  • In Collaboration with

  • Overview

    Proactive Vs Reactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab in Crohn’s 

    Diana M NegoescuEva A Enns, PhD, Brooke SwanhorstBonnie BaumgartnerJames P CampbellMark T Osterman, MDKonstantinos Papamichael, PhDAdam S Cheifetz, MDByron P Vaughn, MD

    Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly performed for Infliximab (IFX) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Reactive TDM is a cost-effective strategy to empiric IFX dose escalation. The cost-effectiveness of proactive TDM is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of proactive vs reactive TDM in a simulated population of CD patients on IFX.

    Methods: We developed a stochastic simulation model of CD patients on IFX and evaluated the expected health costs and outcomes of a proactive TDM strategy compared with a reactive strategy. The proactive strategy measured IFX concentration and antibody status every 6 months, or at the time of a flare, and dosed IFX to a therapeutic window. The reactive strategy only did so at the time of a flare.

    Results: The proactive strategy led to fewer flares than the reactive strategy. More patients stayed on IFX in the proactive vs reactive strategy (63.4% vs 58.8% at year 5). From a health sector perspective, a proactive strategy was marginally cost-effective compared with a reactive strategy (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $146,494 per quality-adjusted life year), assuming a 40% of the wholesale price of IFX. The results were most sensitive to risk of flaring with a low IFX concentration and the cost of IFX.

    Conclusions: Assuming 40% of the average wholesale acquisition cost of biologic therapies, proactive TDM for IFX is marginally cost-effective compared with a reactive TDM strategy. As the cost of infliximab decreases, a proactive monitoring strategy is more cost-effective.

Facebook Comments

Programs 9/16/21