Vonoprazan Dual Therapy Matched Quadruple Therapy In H Pylori Trial

Key Takeaways
- Dual, triple, and bismuth quadruple vonoprazan-based regimens were all associated with high eradication rates, and the authors reported noninferiority of dual and triple therapy versus bismuth quadruple therapy.
- Adverse events were reported in 6.4% with dual therapy, 36.0% with triple therapy, and 49.6% with bismuth quadruple therapy.
- Compliance exceeded 93% in all groups without a significant between-group difference, and the authors also described the 10-day dual regimen as using less antibiotic exposure.
ITT eradication was 92.0% (95% CI 85.8%-96.1%) with V-DT, 89.6% (82.9%-94.3%) with V-TT, and 88.8% (81.9%-93.7%) with V-BQT. mITT eradication was 94.3% (95% CI 88.5%-97.7%), 94.9% (89.3%-98.1%), and 94.1% (88.2%-97.6%), respectively. PP eradication was 94.2% (95% CI 88.4%-97.6%), 95.6% (90.0%-98.5%), and 94.8% (89.0%-98.1%), respectively. Investigators reported formal noninferiority of V-DT and V-TT versus V-BQT. Across intention-to-treat, modified intention-to-treat, and per-protocol analyses, efficacy was tightly clustered, without clear numerical separation between groups.
Safety differences were more distinct than efficacy differences, with adverse events occurring least often in the dual-therapy group and differing significantly across arms (p < 0.001). Compliance exceeded 93% in all groups, and between-group differences were not significant (p = 0.250).
The authors concluded that the 10-day dual regimen produced eradication comparable to V-BQT with fewer adverse events and less antibiotic exposure. They also said the findings support its potential as a simplified first-line option. The reported distinction between regimens centered on tolerability and treatment burden rather than eradication success during follow-up.