1. Home
  2. Medical News
  3. Oncology
advertisement

Tucidinostat Plus R-CHOP Improves Event-Free Survival in DEL DLBCL

tucidinostat plus r chop improves event free survival in del dlbcl
04/24/2026

Key Takeaways

  • Event-free survival was better with tucidinostat plus R-CHOP than with placebo plus R-CHOP.
  • Complete response was observed more often with the tucidinostat-containing regimen.
  • Toxicity was higher with tucidinostat and was generally manageable with supportive care.
Among patients with newly diagnosed MYC/BCL2 double-expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a randomized phase 3 JAMA randomized clinical trial found 2-year event-free survival rates of 60.3% with tucidinostat plus R-CHOP and 50.5% with placebo plus R-CHOP. The trial compared oral tucidinostat added to frontline R-CHOP with placebo plus R-CHOP in this biomarker-defined population. The primary end point favored tucidinostat.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial was conducted at 40 study centers in China and enrolled 423 eligible patients randomized 1:1. Enrollment ran from May 21, 2020, through July 25, 2022, in patients with newly diagnosed MYC/BCL2 double-expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Participants received oral tucidinostat 20 mg on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21-day cycle plus 6 cycles of R-CHOP, or matching placebo plus 6 cycles of R-CHOP. Patients with complete response after combination therapy could continue assigned maintenance for up to 24 weeks. The median age was 63 years, and 47.5% were male. Event-free survival was the primary end point.

Follow-up extended through June 26, 2025, with a median follow-up from randomization of 41.3 months. The event-free survival hazard ratio was 0.72 for tucidinostat plus R-CHOP versus placebo plus R-CHOP (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.96; P value = .02). At that follow-up, event-free survival remained in favor of tucidinostat.

Complete response was observed in 73.0% of patients receiving tucidinostat plus R-CHOP and 61.8% receiving placebo plus R-CHOP, an absolute difference of 11.1% (95% CI, 2.3% to 20.0%). Secondary end points included progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and tolerability. Toxicity was higher in the tucidinostat group and was generally manageable with supportive care.

Register

We’re glad to see you’re enjoying ReachMD…
but how about a more personalized experience?

Register for free