COVID-19 upended almost every aspect of daily life, including consumer and retailer behavior. However, it was not the first pandemic that changed how we shop.
In 2009-10, populations across the globe were rocked by the H1N1 swine flu outbreak. Mass panic buying of personal hygiene products, such as hand sanitizer, was common. Just as with the early days of COVID-19, stores quickly sold out of suddenly in-demand items, with supply chains struggling to meet surging demand.
The swine flu pandemic claimed the lives of up to 300,000 people worldwide. Its two waves each lasted around 16 weeks, providing researchers with an ideal experiment to compare consumer behavior and retailer responses to those from the outbreak of COVID-19.
Xiaodan Pan, an associate professor in the Department of Supply Chain and Business Technology Management at the John Molson School of Business, has published a new paper on the topic in the Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. In it, she uses the hand sanitizer market to see what was learned from the 2009-10 swine flu event and to develop lessons for consumers and retailers today.
Pan and her co-authors examined hand sanitizer sales from the United States spanning a 10-year period from 2008 to 2017. Weekly statistics were gathered from the NielsenIQ Retail Scanner Data, a database that tracks product prices and sales volumes as well as store characteristics from more than 38,000 stores across more than 90 participating retail chains. The researchers also collected data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to track seasonal flu epidemics and the swine flu pandemic across the country.
Pan's study found that there was a surge in demand for hand sanitizer as the swine flu pandemic was declared. This demand surge created initial shortages in hand sanitizer products. However, the industry strategically adapted to the stockpiling behavior, increasing the supply of large pack-size sanitizer products that were in greatest demand. By the second wave of the swine flu pandemic, large pack-size hand sanitizer sales exceeded small pack-size sales, illustrating a shift in consumer behavior and retailer product availability.
The researchers found no evidence of price gouging by the major retailers. They also noted that there were clear winners among retailer types, with warehouse clubs that specialized in large pack-size products and drug stores that provided a great variety of products leading hand sanitizer sales.
A decade of sanitizer sales data
In framing her study, Pan gathered a decade's worth of weekly sanitizer sales data. "We could not just look at the swine flu pandemic," Pan says. "We needed a natural experiment, so we used the 2008–09 seasonal flu epidemic (that preceded the 2009-10 swine flu pandemic) as the base case, and then we examined sanitizer sales during the 2009-10 swine flu pandemic as well as sales through seven subsequent seasonal flu epidemics."
The study revealed three principal findings:
"I think the biggest lesson here is that there is no need for panic buying. The evidence shows that supply and demand will balance out quickly without price gouging," Pan says. "Retail chains value their reputations, so they won't want to tarnish them by raising prices during a public health emergency to sidestep negative perceptions of price fairness."
Martin Dresner of the University of Maryland, Guang Li of Queen's University and Benny Mantin of the University of Luxembourg contributed to this study.
More information: Xiaodan Pan et al, Stocking up on hand sanitizer: Pandemic lessons for retailers and consumers, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103763
Citation: The big lesson from past pandemics? Avoid panic buying, says new research (2024, May 7) retrieved 7 May 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2024-05-big-lesson-pandemics-panic-buying.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.