Smoking Linked to Lower Anti-TNF Effectiveness in IBD

Key Takeaways
- Among patients with UC or CD receiving advanced therapy, active smoking was associated with lower anti-TNF effectiveness than never smoking.
- Across advanced therapies overall, the smoking association weakened after repeated treatment courses within patients were accounted for.
- Former smokers had outcomes comparable to never smokers; active smokers required more treatment courses than never smokers in both UC and CD.
- No significant differences were shown for vedolizumab or ustekinumab, although the smaller samples were not sufficient to rule out a clinically relevant effect.
Never smokers had greater anti-TNF effectiveness than active smokers in adjusted analyses, with OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-2.00; p = 0.03. That association remained significant after repeated treatment courses within patients were modeled, with OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.80; p = 0.04. Across advanced therapies overall, the adjusted association also favored never smokers, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55; p = 0.04, but became non-significant after repeated-course modeling. Former smokers had outcomes comparable to never smokers, active smokers required more treatment courses than never smokers in both UC and CD (p = 0.03), and no significant differences were shown for vedolizumab or ustekinumab.
These findings reflect associations from a retrospective single-center cohort rather than causal effects, and the clearest signal was reported for anti-TNF therapy rather than uniformly across all advanced therapies.
The authors concluded that smoking was associated with a negative impact on anti-TNF effectiveness in both UC and CD, and the finding supports systematic smoking cessation counseling and patient education as part of IBD management.
Clinician Questions
Which advanced therapies were included in the smoking-status analysis in inflammatory bowel disease?
The analysis included anti-TNF therapy, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, Janus kinase inhibitor therapy, interleukin-23 inhibitor therapy, and etrasimod. The anti-TNF effectiveness analysis itself was limited to infliximab and adalimumab after golimumab courses were excluded.
How broadly do the smoking findings in IBD appear to apply across drug classes?
The clearest reported association was with anti-TNF therapy, while the overall advanced-therapy signal weakened after repeated treatment courses were taken into account. No significant differences were demonstrated for vedolizumab or ustekinumab.
What outcomes were measured in the smoking analysis for patients with UC or CD receiving advanced therapy?
The primary outcome was the rate of clinical response and remission. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic improvement, the need for advanced-therapy sequencing, and surgery.