Be part of the knowledge.
Register

We’re glad to see you’re enjoying ReachMD…
but how about a more personalized experience?

Register for free
  1. Home
  2. Medical News
  3. ESC Congress 2024

Mass AF screening does not reduce adverse outcomes in older adults

ESC 2024 Image
09/03/2024

This summary is based on the presentation of Katrin Kemp Gudmundsdottir, MD, PhD (Stockholm, Sweden) at the ESC Congress 2024 - STROKESTOP II - Randomised systematic NT-proBNP and ECG screening for atrial fibrillation among 75 year-olds.

Introduction and methods

According to the 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of AF, population-based screening for AF using a prolonged, noninvasive ECG-based approach should be considered in individuals aged ≥75 years and in those aged ≥65 years with additional stroke risk factors. The aim of the current study was to examine whether AF screening using ECG recording in combination with NT-proBNP measurement reduces the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism and what the prognostic value of NT-proBNP measurement in AF screening is.

The STROKESTOP II trial was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, parallel-group, unmasked RCT on a stepwise mass screening program that enrolled all residents aged 75 or 76 years of the Stockholm region in Sweden (n=28,712). They were randomized to receiving an invitation to screening for AF (intervention) or not being invited (control). In the intervention group, NT-proBNP levels were analyzed in participants with no history of AF, after which they were stratified into 2 groups: low risk (NT-proBNP <125 ng/L) and high risk (≥125 ng/L). Low-risk participants made a single one-lead ECG recording themselves using a handheld ambulatory ECG recorder, whereas high-risk participants were instructed to record a 30-s ECG 4 times a day for 2 weeks.

In total, 13,905 people were invited to the AF screening, of whom 6843 (49.2%) accepted the invitation. The control group comprised 13,884 individuals, and 451 people died or emigrated. In the intervention group, 2542 individuals (40.5%) was considered “low risk” based on their NT-proBNP levels, whereas the remaining 3743 (59.5%) were regarded as “high risk.” Median follow-up duration was 5.1 years (IQR: 5.0–5.8). New AF was detected in 165 of the 6843 screened participants (2.4%); they were offered oral anticoagulation treatment. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of stroke or systemic embolism.

Main results

  • The incidence rate of the primary endpoint of stroke or systemic embolism was similar in the intervention group (including both individuals that participated in the screening and those invited who did not attend) and control group (HR: 0.96; 95%CI: 0.86–1.06; P=0.412).
  • When screened participants with low NT-proBNP levels (<125 ng/L) were compared with the control group, the risk of the primary endpoint was decreased (HR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.46–0.74; P<0.001 ).
  • Participants in the high-risk group (NT-proBNP ≥125 ng/L) had an increased risk of the primary endpoint compared with the low-risk group (HR: 1.57; 95%CI: 1.22–2.02; P=0.001).

Conclusion

In Stockholm residents aged 75 or 76 years, stepwise mass screening for AF using NT-proBNP measurement in combination with handheld ECG recording did not reduce the incidence of the primary composite endpoint of stroke or systemic embolism compared with no screening during 5-year follow-up. Of note, only 49% of those invited participated in the screening. Low NT-proBNP levels (<125 ng/L) correctly identified individuals at lower risk of a primary endpoint event. Dr. Kemp Gudmundsdottir therefore concluded that “NT-proBNP can be safely used to determine who not to screen for AF.”

- Our reporting is based on the information provided at the ESC Congress 2024 -

The findings of this study were simultaneously published in Circulation.

Schedule18 Nov 2024