High-Dose Oral Rifampin in Adults With Tuberculous Meningitis

Key Takeaways
- Adults assigned to the higher cumulative rifampin dose did not show a survival advantage at 6 months.
- Drug-induced liver injury was reported more often with intensified rifampin, and no deaths from liver injury were reported.
- The authors concluded that benefit was not evident and that possible harm could not be excluded.
This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled adults with tuberculous meningitis in Indonesia, South Africa, and Uganda, including participants with and without HIV coinfection. The intention-to-treat population included 499 participants, with 249 assigned to the high-dose group and 250 to standard-dose therapy; 304 were living with HIV, and 428 had definite or probable disease. All participants received standard daily isoniazid, rifampin 10 mg/kg, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide as the backbone regimen. The intervention group received additional rifampin to a cumulative dose of 35 mg/kg for 8 weeks, whereas the comparison group received matched placebo for 8 weeks. Participants then continued standard therapy for the remainder of the 9- to 12-month course, and 6-month mortality was the prespecified primary outcome.
By 6 months, 109 participants in the high-dose rifampin group and 100 in the standard-dose group had died. The corresponding Kaplan-Meier mortality estimates were 44.6% and 40.7%, with a hazard ratio for death of 1.17. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 0.89 to 1.54, and the reported P value was 0.25. Among participants who died within 6 months, median time to death was 13 days in the intensified group and 24 days in controls. The interquartile ranges were 4 to 39 days and 6 to 56 days, and there was no mortality benefit with dose intensification.
Drug-induced liver injury was reported in 8.0% of the high-dose group and 4.4% of the standard-dose group. This was the notable adverse event difference reported between groups, and fatal liver toxicity was not seen. No deaths from drug-induced liver injury were reported during follow-up. The investigators concluded that no evidence of beneficial effect was observed and that a harmful effect could not be ruled out.