medicalxpress.com
Emory researchers have developed a new cardiovascular risk score incorporating stress test responses to better predict heart disease risk.
Understanding and quantifying stress's impact on heart health is crucial as stress-induced conditions are hard to measure objectively, influencing treatment approaches.
Emory University researchers have developed a novel cardiovascular reactivity risk score that integrates stress test responses to enhance the prediction of heart disease. This new scoring method, tested on 629 individuals, identifies key stress-related physiological changes linked to cardiovascular issues. By acknowledging and quantifying stress-induced changes, the score provides a more accurate risk assessment tool, addressing what has traditionally been subjective perceptions of stress. The study encourages future research to explore the clinical applications of these findings, potentially refining patient care strategies.
Traditional heart disease assessments have relied heavily on subjective stress perceptions, limiting accuracy.
Objective measurement techniques allow for more consistent and reliable assessment of risk.
From a principle that objective measures are more reliable than subjective ones, it follows that heart disease prediction improves with objective stress measurements.
Traditional methods of assessing cardiovascular disease risk often rely on patient-reported levels of stress, which can vary greatly and are prone to bias. By incorporating objective measures into these assessments, researchers from Emory University are making strides toward improving the accuracy of heart disease predictions.
"Until recently, we were unable to directly measure the impact of stress on heart disease and had to rely mostly on patients' subjective perceptions of stress," stated Moazzami. He emphasized the importance of quantifying stress responses objectively.
This approach helps eliminate inconsistencies found in subjective assessments, providing a clearer picture for healthcare professionals when determining heart disease risk.
The cardiovascular reactivity risk score ties physiological responses to stress directly to heart disease risk.
Combining multiple stress response indicators provides a comprehensive risk assessment tool.
This is similar to how composite scores in other tests provide a more holistic view of the subject being evaluated.
The development of this risk score involves collections of physiological responses during controlled stress tests. Such responses include changes in blood vessel function and blood pressure regulation, which can indicate heightened cardiovascular risk.
"Our goal was to combine these three findings into a single risk score," Moazzami said. He explained how this composite score could present a more reliable prediction model.
By using this approach, the study not only adds precision to risk prediction but also aligns with broader trends of personalized medicine, emphasizing procedures informed by comprehensive data rather than singular metrics.
Implementing stress-based risk scores can transform cardiovascular disease management by allowing for tailored interventions.
Such precision in diagnosis and care is more effective and beneficial for patients at risk.
If stress risk scores improve risk prediction, then their clinical use should lead to better health outcomes by targeting high-risk individuals more effectively.
The introduction of an objective risk score based on stress responses represents a potential turning point in the management of cardiovascular health. By identifying stress as a measurable factor, healthcare providers could tailor interventions more effectively.
"By adopting protocols similar to those used in this study, we can routinely evaluate the impact of stress in cardiology clinics," Moazzami noted, suggesting that this could change standard practices in patient care.
Future studies will focus on how this risk score can be integrated into clinical routines effectively, ensuring that it complements existing assessment tools and enhances patient outcomes by providing more targeted care.
Moazzami, K., Quyyumi, A., & Vaccarino, V. (2025). Cardiovascular Reactivity to Mental Stress and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.034683